네덜란드에서의 대규모 피해에 대한 집단 배상 청구

대량 피해에 대한 집단 청구: 작동 방식

Since 1 January 2020, a representative organisation can claim damages in money on behalf of a large group of injured parties in the Netherlands, unless the group is too diverse for a single collective claim to work. That change came from the Act on the Resolution of Mass Damages in a Collective Action (Wet afwikkeling massaschade in collectieve actie, WAMCA). Before the WAMCA, a collective action could only obtain a declaration that conduct was unlawful; each injured party still had to bring an individual claim, or the parties had to reach a settlement for a court to declare it binding.

Mass damage is loss suffered by a large group of victims from the same cause: a defective product, a data breach, misleading financial information, an environmental incident, a cartel. In these situations the loss per person is often modest while the total is large, which is exactly why individual litigation usually does not happen.

WAMCA에서 무엇이 바뀌었나요?

The WAMCA gave representative organisations the power to claim money damages for the group as a whole, instead of only a declaration of unlawfulness. It also introduced strict admissibility requirements for the organisation bringing the claim, and a central register in which every collective action is published.

누가 집단 소송을 제기할 수 있습니까?

Only a foundation or association that represents the interests concerned under its articles of association, and that meets strict admissibility requirements. It must be sufficiently representative of the group, have adequate governance and supervision, be transparent about its funding, and have made a genuine attempt to resolve the matter with the defendant before starting proceedings. The claim is entered in a central register, and other organisations get the opportunity to bring a competing action about the same event.

If several organisations come forward, the court appoints one of them as exclusive representative to conduct the action for the whole group. That rule exists to prevent parallel proceedings about the same facts.

결과에 구속되는 사람은 누구인가?

Injured parties resident in the Netherlands fall within the class automatically and are bound unless they opt out within a period set by the court. Injured parties resident abroad generally have to opt in. As a result, a company facing a WAMCA action deals with the whole Dutch class at once, rather than with individual claimants one by one.

If the parties reach a collective settlement, the court can approve it and declare it binding on the class, again subject to a right to opt out.

이것이 실제로 무엇을 의미합니까?

For claimants, the WAMCA has made it realistic to pursue losses that would never justify an individual case on their own. For companies, it has made the Netherlands one of the more active jurisdictions in Europe for collective redress, and it has changed how mass incidents are assessed: exposure from a single event is now aggregated from the outset, not built up claim by claim.

네덜란드 집단소송 에 대한 자세한 안내서는 절차, 적격 요건 및 판례를 모두 설명합니다.

결론

  • Since 1 January 2020, the WAMCA allows representative organisations to claim money damages for a group, not only a declaration of unlawfulness.
  • Only a foundation or association meeting strict admissibility requirements can bring the claim, and it is registered centrally.
  • Where several organisations compete, the court appoints one exclusive representative for the whole group.
  • Dutch residents are in the class automatically (opt out); foreign residents generally have to opt in.
  • The early decisions, on opting out, challenging admissibility, and the pre-litigation phase, matter most for both claimants and defendants.

집단 행동에 대한 조언

Whether you are considering joining a collective action, or your company has been served with one, the early decisions matter most: whether to opt out, whether to challenge admissibility, and how to handle the phase before proceedings begin.

현재 상황이 어떤지 잘 모르시겠나요? 상황을 알려주시면 영업일 기준 하루 이내에 가능한 해결책을 안내해 드리겠습니다.

방법 Law & More 이에 대해 저희가 어떻게 도움을 드릴 수 있는지 자세히 설명드리겠습니다. 기업 변호사 페이지를 확인하시기 바랍니다.

루비 반 케르 스 베르겐
Ruby van Kersbergen은 변호사입니다. Law & More in Eindhoven Amsterdam그녀는 계약법, 회사법 및 기업 법률 서비스 분야를 전문으로 하며, 이민법 분야에서도 활동합니다.

법률 지원이 필요하신가요?

소환장이나 판결문 등 서류를 받으셨습니까? 해당 서류를 저희에게 보내주시면, 적용되는 기한과 가능한 선택 사항을 확인해 드리겠습니다.

이 글은 일반적인 정보를 제공하는 것이며, 귀하의 특정 상황에 대한 조언을 대신할 수 없습니다.

관련 기사

이전에 근무했던 직원을 재고용하는 것, 즉 '부메랑 직원'을 고용하는 것은 네덜란드 법에 따라 새로운 고용 관계를 형성합니다.

알고리즘 기반 관리, 즉 인공지능 시스템을 활용하여 직원을 모니터링, 평가 및 관리하는 것은 허용됩니다.

준거법, 국제물품매매협약(CISG), 관할권 및 표준 약관에 대한 네덜란드 우선권 원칙: 실제로 무엇을 의미하는가

네덜란드 법에 따르면 일반적으로 아무런 비용 지불 없이 협상을 중단할 수 있습니다. 책임

본 가이드를 통해 국제 회사법을 자세히 알아보세요. 명확한 설명, 핵심 개념 및 중요성을 제공합니다.

소유권 유보(eigendomsvoorbehoud)는 공급자인 귀하가 납품한 제품의 소유권을 유지할 수 있도록 합니다.

네덜란드 법률 최신 정보를 받아보세요

최신 법률 정보, 규제 업데이트 및 실용적인 조언을 받아보시려면 뉴스레터를 구독하세요.